New Harry Potter LEGO sets go back to Prisoner of Azkaban and Goblet of Fire April 29, 2019 Harry Potter LEGO sets go back to Prisoner of Azkaban, Goblet of Fire.
| Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban | |
|---|---|
| Directed by | Alfonso Cuarón |
| Produced by |
|
| Screenplay by | Steve Kloves |
| Based on | Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban by J. K. Rowling |
| Starring | |
| Music by | John Williams |
| Cinematography | Michael Seresin |
| Edited by | Steven Weisberg |
|
|
| Distributed by | Warner Bros. Pictures[1] |
|
|
| 142 minutes[2] | |
| Country |
|
| Language | English |
| Budget | $130 million[4] |
| Box office | $796.9 million[4] |
Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban is a 2004 fantasy film directed by Alfonso Cuarón and distributed by Warner Bros. Pictures.[4] It is based on J. K. Rowling's 1999 novel of the same name. The film, which is the third instalment in the Harry Potter film series, was written by Steve Kloves and produced by Chris Columbus, David Heyman, and Mark Radcliffe. The story follows Harry Potter's third year at Hogwarts as he is informed that a prisoner named Sirius Black has escaped from Azkaban and intends to kill him. The film stars Daniel Radcliffe as Harry Potter, alongside Rupert Grint and Emma Watson as Harry's best friends Ron Weasley and Hermione Granger. It also features well-known actors in supporting roles, including Gary Oldman as Sirius Black, David Thewlis as Professor Lupin, Michael Gambon as Albus Dumbledore, Emma Thompson as Sybill Trelawney and Timothy Spall as Peter Pettigrew. It is the sequel to Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets and is followed by Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire.
The film was released on 31 May 2004 in the United Kingdom, and on 4 June 2004 in North America, as the first Harry Potter film released into IMAX theatres and to be using IMAX Technology. The film was nominated for two Academy Awards, Best Original Music Score and Best Visual Effects at the 77th Academy Awards in 2004. Prisoner of Azkaban grossed a total of $796.9 million worldwide,[4] making it the second highest-grossing film of 2004 and received praise for Cuarón's direction and the performances of the lead actors.[5] It marked a notable change in the film series' tone and directing, and is considered by many critics and fans to be one of the best Harry Potter films.[6][7][8][9][10][11][12]
- 3Production
- 5Distribution
- 6Reception
Plot[edit]
Harry Potter has been spending another dissatisfying summer with The Dursleys. When Harry's Aunt Marge insults his parents, he loses his temper and silently wills her to bloat up and float away. Fed up, Harry then flees the Dursleys with his luggage. The Knight Bus delivers Harry to the Leaky Cauldron, where he is pardoned by Minister of Magic Cornelius Fudge for using magic outside of Hogwarts. After reuniting with his best friends Ron Weasley and Hermione Granger, Harry learns that Sirius Black, a convicted supporter of the dark wizard Lord Voldemort, has escaped Azkaban prison and intends to kill Harry.
The trio return to Hogwarts for the school year on the Hogwarts Express, only for dementors to suddenly board the train, searching for Sirius. One enters the trio's compartment, causing Harry to pass out, but new Defence Against the Dark Arts teacher Professor Lupin repels the dementor with a Patronus Charm. At Hogwarts, headmaster Albus Dumbledore announces that dementors will be guarding the school while Sirius is at large. Hogwarts groundskeeper Rubeus Hagrid is announced as the new Care of Magical Creatures teacher; his first class goes awry when Draco Malfoy deliberately provokes the hippogriffBuckbeak, who attacks him. Draco exaggerates his injury, and his father Lucius Malfoy later has Buckbeak sentenced to death.
The Fat Lady's portrait, which guards the Gryffindor quarters, is found ruined and empty. Terrified and hiding in another painting, she tells Dumbledore that Sirius has entered the castle. During a stormy Quidditch match against Hufflepuff, dementors attack Harry, causing him to fall off his broomstick. At Hogsmeade, Harry is shocked to learn that not only had Sirius been his father's best friend and apparently betrayed them to Voldemort, but is also Harry's godfather. Lupin privately teaches Harry to defend himself against dementors, using the Patronus Charm.
After Harry, Ron, and Hermione witness Buckbeak's execution, Ron's pet rat Scabbers bites him and escapes. When Ron gives chase, a large dog appears and drags both Ron and Scabbers into a hole at the Whomping Willow's base. This leads the trio to an underground passage of the Shrieking Shack, where they discover that the dog is actually Sirius, who is an Animagus. Lupin arrives and embraces Sirius as an old friend. He admits to being a werewolf, and explains that Sirius is innocent. Sirius was falsely accused of betraying the Potters to Voldemort, as well as murdering twelve Muggles and their mutual friend, Peter Pettigrew. It is revealed that Scabbers is actually Pettigrew, an Animagus who betrayed the Potters and committed the murders.
Snape arrives to apprehend Black but Harry knocks him unconscious with the Expelliarmus charm. After forcing Pettigrew back into human form, Lupin and Sirius prepare to kill him, but Harry convinces them to turn Pettigrew over to the dementors.
As the group departs, the full moon rises and Lupin transforms into a werewolf. Sirius transforms into his dog form to fight him off. In the midst of the chaos, Pettigrew transforms back into a rat and escapes. Harry and Sirius are attacked by dementors, and Harry sees a figure in the distance save them by casting a powerful Patronus spell. He believes the mysterious figure is his deceased father before passing out. He awakens to discover that Sirius has been captured and sentenced to the Dementor's Kiss.
Acting on Dumbledore's advice, Harry and Hermione travel back in time with Hermione's Time Turner, and watch themselves and Ron repeat the night's events. They save Buckbeak from execution and witness the Dementors overpower Harry and Sirius. The present Harry realises that it was actually him who conjured the Patronus, and does so again. Harry and Hermione rescue Sirius, who escapes with Buckbeak. Exposed as a werewolf, Lupin resigns from teaching to prevent an uproar from parents. He also returns the Marauder's Map back to Harry, given he no longer has the authority to confiscate contrabands. Sirius sends Harry a Firebolt broom, and he happily takes it for a ride.
Cast[edit]
- Daniel Radcliffe as Harry Potter, a 13-year-old British wizard famous for surviving his parents' murder at the hands of the evil dark wizard Lord Voldemort as an infant, who now enters his third year at Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry.
- Rupert Grint as Ron Weasley, Harry's Pure-blood best friend at Hogwarts.
- Emma Watson as Hermione Granger, Harry's Muggle-born best friend and the trio's brains.
- Julie Christie as Madam Rosmerta, the short-tempered landlady of the Three Broomsticks pub in Hogsmeade.
- Robbie Coltrane as Rubeus Hagrid, the gamekeeper and new Care of Magical Creatures teacher at Hogwarts.
- Tom Felton as Draco Malfoy, Harry's arch rival and a Slytherin house student.
- Michael Gambon as Albus Dumbledore, the headmaster of Hogwarts and one of the greatest wizards of the age. Gambon assumed the role after Richard Harris, who played Dumbledore in the previous two films, died of Hodgkin's disease on 25 October 2002, three weeks before the second film's release.[13] Despite his illness, Harris was determined to film his part, telling a visiting David Heyman not to recast the role.[14] Four months after Harris's death, Cuarón chose Gambon as his replacement.[14][15] Gambon was unconcerned with bettering or copying Harris, instead giving his own interpretation, putting on a slight Irish accent for the role,[16] as well as completing his scenes in three weeks.[17] Rumours of Ian McKellen being offered the role started to spread, but when asked he rejected the rumours and stated he had played a similar character in Gandalf of The Lord of the Rings trilogy. He also stated it would have been inappropriate to take Harris's role, as the late actor had called McKellen a 'dreadful' actor.[18][19] Harris's family had expressed an interest in seeing Harris's close friend Peter O'Toole being chosen as his replacement.[20]
- Richard Griffiths as Vernon Dursley, Harry's Muggle uncle.
- Gary Oldman as Sirius Black, Harry's infamous godfather, who escapes from the Wizarding prison Azkaban after serving twelve years there for being falsely accused of being the Death Eater who betrayed Harry's parents to Voldemort. Oldman accepted the part because he needed the money, as he had not taken on any major work in several years after deciding to spend more time with his children.[21] He was 'surprised by how difficult it was to pull off', comparing the role to Shakespearean dialogue.[22]
- Alan Rickman as Severus Snape, the Potions teacher at Hogwarts and head of Slytherin.
- Fiona Shaw as Petunia Dursley, Harry's Muggle aunt.
- Maggie Smith as Minerva McGonagall, Deputy Headmistress of Hogwarts, the Transfiguration teacher at Hogwarts and head of Gryffindor.
- Timothy Spall as Peter Pettigrew, a friend of Harry's parents said to have been killed by Sirius Black, but was later revealed to have been the real Death Eater who betrayed Harry's parents to Voldemort.
- David Thewlis as Remus Lupin, the new Defence Against the Dark Arts teacher at Hogwarts and a werewolf. Thewlis, who had previously auditioned for the role of Quirinus Quirrell in Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone, was Cuarón's first choice for the role of Professor Lupin. He accepted the role on advice from Ian Hart, who was cast as Quirrell, and had told him that Professor Lupin was 'the best part in the book.'[23] Thewlis had seen the first two films and had only read part of the first book, although after taking the role he read the third.[16]
- Emma Thompson as Sybill Trelawney, the Divination teacher at Hogwarts.
Production[edit]
Development[edit]
With Prisoner of Azkaban, production of the Harry Potter films switched to an eighteen-month cycle, which producer David Heyman explained was 'to give each [film] the time it required.'[14]Chris Columbus, the director of the previous two films, decided not to return to helm the third instalment as he 'hadn't seen [his] own kids for supper in the week for about two and a half years.'[24] Even so, he remained on as a producer alongside Heyman.[25]Guillermo del Toro was approached to direct but considered the previous two films 'so bright and happy and full of light, that [he] wasn't interested.'[26]Marc Forster turned down the film because he had made Finding Neverland and did not want to direct child actors again. M. Night Shyamalan was considered to direct but turned it down because he was working on his own film, The Village. Warner Bros. then composed a three-name short list for Columbus's replacement, which comprised Callie Khouri, Kenneth Branagh (who played Gilderoy Lockhart in Chamber of Secrets) and eventual selection Alfonso Cuarón.[27] Cuarón was initially nervous about accepting, as he had not read any of the books or seen the films. After reading the series, he changed his mind and signed on to direct,[28] as he had immediately connected to the story.[25] Cuarón's appointment pleased J. K. Rowling who loved his film Y Tu Mamá También and was impressed with his adaptation of A Little Princess.[29] Heyman found that 'tonally and stylistically, [Cuarón] was the perfect fit.'[14] As his first exercise with the actors who portray the central trio, Cuarón assigned Radcliffe, Grint and Watson to write an autobiographical essay about their character, written in the first person, spanning birth to the discovery of the magical world, and including the character's emotional experience. Of Rupert Grint's essay, Cuarón recalls, 'Rupert didn't deliver the essay. When I questioned why he didn't do it, he said, 'I'm Ron; Ron wouldn't do it.' So I said, 'Okay, you do understand your character.' That was the most important piece of acting work that we did on Prisoner of Azkaban, because it was very clear that everything they put in those essays was going to be the pillars they were going to hold on to for the rest of the process.'[16][30]
Filming[edit]
Principal photography began on 24 February 2003,[15] at Leavesden Film Studios, and wrapped in October 2003.[31]
The third film was the first to extensively utilise real-life locations, as much of the first two films had been shot in the studio. Some sets for the film were built in Glen Coe, Scotland, near the Clachaig Inn. The indoor sets, including ones built for the previous two films, are mainly in Leavesden Film Studios. The Hogwarts Lake was filmed from Loch Shiel, Loch Eilt and Loch Morar in the Scottish Highlands. Incidentally, the train bridge, which was also featured in the Chamber of Secrets, is opposite Loch Shiel and was used to film the sequences when the Dementor boarded the train. A small section of the triple-decker bus scene, where it weaves in between traffic, was filmed in North London's Palmers Green. Some parts were also filmed in and around Borough Market and Lambeth Bridge in London.
Hogwarts grew and expanded significantly with the third film. For the first time, the Hogwarts courtyard and bridge were seen. At the end of the bridge, rock monoliths were placed onto the hillside to evoke a Celtic feeling. The use of live-action also significantly changed the look of Hagrid's hut. In the first two films, it appeared at the end of a flat stretch, right in front of the Forbidden Forest. The third film utilised the more rugged Scottish locations to place Hagrid's hut at the bottom of a steep hillside. A large pumpkin patch was added behind the hut.
The Honeydukes set in this film is a redress of the set of Flourish & Blotts that was seen in Chamber of Secrets, which, in turn, was a redress of the Ollivanders set from the first film.
Rowling allowed Cuarón to make minor changes to the book, on the condition that he stuck to the book's spirit.[28] She allowed him to place a sundial on Hogwarts' grounds, but rejected a graveyard, as that would play an important part in the then unreleased sixth book.[28] Rowling said she 'got goosebumps' when she saw several moments in the film, as they inadvertently referred to events in the final two books, she stated 'people are going to look back on the film and think that those were put in deliberately as clues.'[29] When filming concluded, Cuarón found that it had 'been the two sweetest years of my life,' and expressed his interest in directing one of the sequels.[28]
The karaoke version without the vocal guide is available on www.karafun.com. Hallelujah song karaoke download. Download MP3:Sing Online:. This recording is a cover of Hallelujah (Duet Version) as made famous by Sing - This version is not the original version, and is not performed by Sing. This version contains a low volume vocal guide to help you learn the song.
Effects[edit]
Cuarón originally wanted to move away from CGI toward puppetry. He hired master underwater puppeteer Basil Twist to help, using puppets to study the potential movement of the Dementors.[14] Once it became apparent that puppetry would be too expensive and unable to portray the specific elements of the Dementors, Cuarón turned to CGI; however, he and his team did use footage of Dementor puppets underwater as a basis for the flowing movements of the computer-generated Dementors.
The Knight Bus segment when Harry is being taken to The Leaky Cauldron uses the technique known as bullet time, popularised in The Matrix series of films. This segment takes humorous advantage of the magic quality of the Harry Potter world by having the Muggle world go into bullet time while inside the Knight Bus, Harry, Stan Shunpike and Ernie Prang (and the talking shrunken head) keep moving in real time.
Music[edit]
The Academy Award-nominated score was the third and final score in the series to be composed and conducted by John Williams. It was released on CD on 25 May 2004. In general, this film's music is not as bright as that of the previous films, with distinct medieval influences in the instrumentation. One of the new themes, 'Double Trouble,' was written during production so that a children's choir could perform it in Hogwarts's Great Hall in one of the film's earlier scenes. The lyrics of 'Double Trouble' are from a ritual performed by the Weïrd Sisters in Act 4, Scene 1 of Shakespeare's Macbeth.[32] The film's trailer prominently features the cues 'Anticipation' and 'Progeny' by Brand X Music, a trailer music band.
Differences from the book[edit]
Prisoner of Azkaban was, at the time of publication, the series' longest book. The increasing plot complexity necessitated a looser adaptation of the book's finer plot lines and back-story. The film opens with Harry using magic to light his wand in short bursts, whereas in the same scene in the book, he uses a torch/flashlight, as performing magic outside the wizard world is illegal for wizards under the age of seventeen. The connection between Harry's parents and the Marauder's Map is only briefly mentioned,[33] as is Remus Lupin's association to both the map and James Potter.[34] Additionally, it was never mentioned who the Marauders were or who the nicknames Moony, Wormtail, Padfoot, and Prongs referred to. Some exposition was removed for dramatic effect: both the Shrieking Shack and Scabbers the rat are mentioned only very briefly in the film, while they receive a more thorough coverage in the novel.[33] Most of Sirius Black's back story is also cut, with no mention of the manner of his escape from Azkaban.[34] Only the first Quidditch game was kept in the film, due to its importance to the storyline; the second (Gryffindor/Ravenclaw) and third (Gryffindor/Slytherin) were cut. Thus, Harry receives the Firebolt at the film's end, while in the book he receives it anonymously at Christmas and it is confiscated for a few weeks to be checked for possible jinxes by Professor Flitwick and Madam Hooch.
On account of pace and time considerations, the film glosses over detailed descriptions of magical education. Only one Hippogriff, Buckbeak, is seen, and only Malfoy and Harry are seen interacting with the Hippogriff during Care of Magical Creatures lessons, and most other lessons, including all of Snape'spotions classes, were cut from the film.[33] The Fidelius Charm's complicated description is removed entirely from the film, with no explanation given of exactly how Sirius is supposed to have betrayed the Potters to Lord Voldemort. Many of this scene's lines are redistributed amongst Cornelius Fudge and Minerva McGonagall; in compensation, McGonagall's exposition of the Animagus transformation is instead given by Snape.[33]
In the film, where Harry and Hermione have travelled back in time and are hiding outside of Hagrid's hut, it is heavily implied that Dumbledore somehow knows that they are there, as he distracts the other characters at key moments or slows down the proceedings (such as by suggesting that he sign Buckbeak's execution order as well, then after Fudge agrees he says it will take some time as he has an extremely long name), which allows Harry and Hermione time to free Buckbeak unseen. In the book, Dumbledore merely comments that the executioner must sign the order, right before he is about to leave the cabin to execute Buckbeak.
The embryonic romantic connection between Ron and Hermione is more prominent in the film than the book; in response to criticism of the first two films for sacrificing character development for mystery and adventure, the emotional development of all three lead characters is given more attention in the third film.[33] That said, any mention of the beginnings of Harry's crush on Cho Chang is removed.[35] Chang herself is not even seen until the next film. Harry's darker side is first glimpsed in this film, when Harry proclaims, 'I hope he [Black] finds me. Cause when he does, I'm going to be ready. When he does, I'm going to kill him!'[33]
Distribution[edit]
Marketing[edit]
As with the series' previous instalments, Prisoner of Azkaban was a large merchandising opportunity.[36] The video game version, designed by EA UK, was released 25 May 2004 in North America and 29 May 2004 in Europe. Mattel released film tie-ins that included the Harry Potter Championship Quidditch board game and character action figures.[37]Lego also expanded on its previous merchandising for the first two films with the release of sets ranging from the Knight Bus to the Shrieking Shack.[38]
Theatrical release[edit]
Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban held its New York premiere at Radio City Music Hall on 23 May 2004,[39] followed by its London premiere at Leicester Square on 30 May 2004.[40] The film then opened in the United Kingdom on 31 May 2004 and on 4 June 2004 in the United States. It was the first film in the series to be released in both conventional and IMAX theatres.[41]
Reception[edit]
Box office[edit]
Upon release, the film broke the record for biggest single day in the United Kingdom's box office history making £5.3 million on a Monday.[42] It went on to break records both with and without previews, making £23.9 million including previews[43] and £9.3 million excluding them.[44]Prisoner of Azkaban had the highest-opening weekend at the UK's box office, until Spectre beat the record in 2015. It went on to make a total of £45.6 million in the UK.[45] The film made $93.7 million during its opening weekend in the United States and Canada at 3,855 theatres, achieving, at the time, the third biggest-opening weekend of all time.[46] This opening also broke Hulk's record ($62.1 million) for the highest-opening weekend for a film released in June.[46]Prisoner of Azkaban held this record for five years until Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen topped it in 2009 with $108.9 million.[47] The film was also No. 1 at the North American box office for two consecutive weekends.[48]
Prisoner of Azkaban made a total of $796.7 million worldwide,[4] which made it 2004's second-highest-grossing film worldwide behind Shrek 2.[49] In the U.S. and Canada, it was only the year's sixth-highest-grossing film, making $249.5 million.[50] Everywhere else in the world, however, it was the year's number one film, making $547 million compared to Shrek 2's $478.6 million.[51] Despite its successful box office run, Azkaban is the lowest-grossing Harry Potter film (all the others have grossed more than $800 million worldwide) and the second lowest-grossing film of the Wizarding World series (behind Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald).
Critical response[edit]
Prisoner of Azkaban is often regarded by critics and fans as one of the best films in the franchise.[6][7][8][9][10][11][12] On the review aggregator Rotten Tomatoes the film has an approval rating of 90% based on 255 reviews, with an average rating of 7.84/10. The site's critical consensus reads, 'Under the assured direction of Alfonso Cuarón, Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban triumphantly strikes a delicate balance between technical wizardry and complex storytelling.'[52] On Metacritic the film has a score of 82 out of 100, based on 40 critics, indicating 'universal acclaim'.[53] On CinemaScore, audiences gave the film an average grade of 'A' on an A+ to F scale.[54]
Mick LaSalle of the San Francisco Chronicle lauded the film's more mature tone and said it was 'darker, more complex, rooted in character.'[55]The Hollywood Reporter called the film 'a deeper, darker, visually arresting and more emotionally satisfying adaptation of the J.K. Rowling literary phenomenon,' especially compared to the first two installments.[56]Peter Travers of Rolling Stone gave the film three-and-a-half out of four stars: 'Not only is this dazzler by far the best and most thrilling of the three Harry Potter movies to date, it's a film that can stand on its own even if you never heard of author J.K. Rowling and her young wizard hero.'[57] Stephanie Zacharek of Salon.com asserts it to be 'one of the greatest fantasy films of all time.'[58] Nicole Arthur of The Washington Post praised the film as 'complex, frightening, [and] nuanced.'[59]Roger Ebert gave the film three-and-a-half out of four stars, saying that the film was not quite as good as the first two, but still called it 'delightful, amusing and sophisticated.'[60] Claudia Puig from USA Today found the film to be 'a visual delight,' and added that 'Cuarón is not afraid to make a darker film and tackle painful emotions.'[61] while Richard Roeper called the film 'a creative triumph.'[62] Sean Smith from Newsweek said: 'The Prisoner of Azkaban boasts a brand-new director and a bold new vision,' he also called the film 'moving,' praising the performances by the three main leads,[63] while Entertainment Weekly praised the film for being more mature than its predecessors.[64]
Accolades[edit]
Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban was nominated for Best Original Music Score (John Williams) and Best Visual Effects at the 77th Academy Awards held in 2005.[65] This was the second film in the series to be nominated for an Oscar.
The film also ranks at No. 471 in Empire magazine's 2008 list of the 500 greatest movies of all time.[66]IGN designated Prisoner of Azkaban as the fifth best fantasy film.[67] Additionally, Moviefone designated the film as the tenth best of the decade. In 2011, the film was voted Film of the Decade at the First Light Awards by children aged 5–15.[68]
- American Film Institute recognition
- AFI's 100 Years..100 Movies – Nominated[69]
- AFI's 10 Top 10 – Nominated Fantasy Film[70]
| List of awards and nominations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
See also[edit]
References[edit]
Prisoner Of Azkaban Imdb
- ^ abcd'HARRY POTTER AND THE PRISONER OF AZKABAN (2004)'. AFI Catalog of Feature Films. Archived from the original on 24 July 2018. Retrieved 24 July 2018.
- ^'Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban (PG)'. British Board of Film Classification. 13 May 2004. Archived from the original on 5 January 2016. Retrieved 27 December 2015.
- ^Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban (2004)Archived 20 December 2016 at the Wayback Machine Film Forever
- ^ abcde'Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban (2004)'. Box Office Mojo. Archived from the original on 12 February 2009. Retrieved 5 February 2009.
- ^'Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban'. Archived from the original on 2 February 2017. Retrieved 21 January 2017.
- ^ ab'A Definitive Ranking of the Harry Potter Movies'. 11 November 2016. Archived from the original on 20 March 2019. Retrieved 14 November 2018.
- ^ ab'All Harry Potter movies ranked worst to best by Tomatometer'. 13 November 2016. Archived from the original on 7 December 2018. Retrieved 14 November 2018.
- ^ ab'Harry Potter Movies in Order of Ranking in the Series'. 14 February 2015. Archived from the original on 29 June 2016. Retrieved 8 July 2016.
- ^ ab''Harry Potter' Movies Ranked from Worst to Best'. 28 May 2017. Archived from the original on 19 July 2018. Retrieved 8 July 2016.
- ^ abLeigh, Margo (9 March 2015). 'Which 'Harry Potter' Film Is The Best?'. Buzzfeed. Archived from the original on 3 April 2019. Retrieved 12 November 2018.
- ^ ab'Alfonso Cuarón: How the 'Gravity' Director Saved Harry Potter'. Archived from the original on 2 February 2017. Retrieved 21 January 2017.
- ^ ab'How Prisoner of Azkaban Changed Young Adult Cinema Forever'. Archived from the original on 2 February 2017. Retrieved 21 January 2017.
- ^'Actor Richard Harris dies'. BBC News. 25 October 2002. Archived from the original on 6 December 2002. Retrieved 10 October 2007.
- ^ abcdeJensen, Jeff (28 October 2005). 'A Look Back'. Entertainment Weekly. Archived from the original on 29 May 2008. Retrieved 10 October 2007.
- ^ ab'Dumbledore and Sirius cast for Azkaban'. Newsround. 21 February 2003. Archived from the original on 8 August 2007. Retrieved 10 October 2007.
- ^ abcVaughan, Johnny; Henry, Lenny (2004). Head to Shrunken Head (DVD). Warner Bros. Pictures.
- ^Synnot, Siobhan (30 May 2004). 'Olivier, Dumbledore and two broken ribs'. The Scotsman. Archived from the original on 25 May 2007. Retrieved 30 November 2007.
- ^Stern/CompuWeb, Keith. 'Rumours'. mckellen.com. Archived from the original on 14 May 2010. Retrieved 2 May 2010.
- ^MuggleNet – Mckellen on HarrisArchived 10 September 2011 at the Wayback Machine
- ^'Harris' Family Calling for O'Toole To Take on Harry Potter Role'. Internet Movie Database. 9 January 2003. Archived from the original on 11 January 2009. Retrieved 30 November 2007.
- ^'Coventry Evening Telegraph: GO: CINEMA: I CASHED IN ON HARRY POTTER!'. Coventry Evening Telegraph. 28 May 2004.
- ^'Gary Oldman: Seriously Sirius'. Newsround. 28 May 2004. Archived from the original on 21 December 2007. Retrieved 30 November 2007.
- ^Morris, Clint (9 June 2004). 'Interview: David Thewlis'. Movie Hole. Archived from the original on 26 September 2007. Retrieved 28 August 2007.
- ^'Chris Columbus COS: full interview'. Newsround. 13 November 2002. Archived from the original on 29 January 2007. Retrieved 10 October 2007.
- ^ abDickey, Lucinda. 'The creators of Harry Potter break out of character to discuss The Prisoner of Azkaban'. Science Fiction Weekly. Archived from the original on 19 August 2007. Retrieved 10 October 2007.
- ^Carroll, Larry (26 October 2007). 'Guillermo Game For Harry Potter'. MTV. Archived from the original on 27 October 2007. Retrieved 26 October 2007.
- ^Susman, Gary (19 July 2002). 'Great Expectations'. Entertainment Weekly. Archived from the original on 23 August 2007. Retrieved 10 October 2007.
- ^ abcd'Alfonso Cuaron: the man behind the magic'. Newsround. 24 May 2004. Archived from the original on 7 November 2007. Retrieved 10 October 2007.
- ^ abPuig, Claudia (27 May 2004). 'New Potter movie sneaks in spoilers for upcoming books'. USA Today. Archived from the original on 4 May 2011. Retrieved 29 August 2007.
- ^McCabe, Bob. Harry Potter Page to Screen: The Complete Filmmaking Journey. 2011. Harper Design. Page 102.
- ^Schmitz, Greg Dean. 'Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban (2004)'. Yahoo! Movies. Archived from the original on 25 January 2007. Retrieved 10 October 2007.
- ^Shakespeare, William (2009). Macbeth. 4.1.10–45: Simon & Schuster Paperbacks. pp. 119–121. ISBN978-0-7434-7710-9.
- ^ abcdefDadds, Kimberly; Miriam Zendle (9 July 2007). 'Harry Potter: books vs. films'. Digital Spy. Archived from the original on 25 May 2009. Retrieved 10 October 2007.
- ^ ab'Movie Rant'. CanMag Magazine. 28 November 2004. Archived from the original on 12 October 2007. Retrieved 14 September 2007.
- ^'Harry Situation'. Entertainment Weekly. 17 June 2004. Archived from the original on 12 October 2007. Retrieved 10 October 2007.
- ^Watson, Julie (3 June 2004). 'J.K. Rowling And Her Magical Cash Cow'. Forbes. Archived from the original on 5 November 2013. Retrieved 17 October 2012.
- ^Bhatnagar, Parija (10 February 2004). 'Hot in 2004: Movie toys & singing Barbie'. CNN Money. Archived from the original on 2 April 2015. Retrieved 17 October 2012.
- ^'Toy Fair 2004: Harry Potter – LEGO®'. Row M Enterprises, Inc. 2004. Archived from the original on 16 March 2013. Retrieved 17 October 2012.
- ^'Potter star mobbed at US premiere'. BBC News. 24 May 2004. Archived from the original on 8 October 2013. Retrieved 17 October 2012.
- ^'Wizard turn out for Harry Potter premiere'. Daily Mail. 31 May 2004. Archived from the original on 7 February 2011. Retrieved 17 October 2012.
- ^'Potter 3 will be screened on IMAX'. CBBC Newsround. 19 December 2003. Archived from the original on 3 April 2015. Retrieved 17 October 2012.
- ^'Azkaban breaks box office record'. BBC News. 2 June 2004. Archived from the original on 9 March 2008. Retrieved 24 September 2007.
- ^'Highest UK box office opening weekends'. 25th Frame. Archived from the original on 15 February 2011. Retrieved 7 April 2011.
- ^'All time box office openings no previews'. Sky is Falling. Archived from the original on 23 August 2007. Retrieved 24 September 2007.
- ^'Harry Potter and The Prisoner of Azkaban UK box office'. 25th Frame. Archived from the original on 21 May 2012. Retrieved 7 April 2011.
- ^ abGray, Brandon (7 June 2004). 'Hotter Potter: Summer Bow Yields Franchise High'. Box Office Mojo. Archived from the original on 3 October 2007. Retrieved 22 September 2007.
- ^Gray, Brandon (29 June 2009). 'Weekend Report: 'Revenge of the Fallen' Rises with Optimal Debut'. Box Office Mojo. Archived from the original on 5 June 2011. Retrieved 3 November 2010.
- ^'June 11-13, 2004 Weekend'. Box Office Mojo. Archived from the original on 2 December 2013. Retrieved 24 November 2013.
- ^'2004 WORLDWIDE GROSSES'. Box Office Mojo. Archived from the original on 23 August 2013. Retrieved 24 September 2007.
- ^'2004 DOMESTIC GROSSES'. Box Office Mojo. Archived from the original on 17 January 2013. Retrieved 24 September 2007.
- ^'OVERSEAS TOTAL YEARLY BOX OFFICE'. Box Office Mojo. Archived from the original on 12 October 2007. Retrieved 24 September 2007.
- ^'Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban (2004)'. Rotten Tomatoes. Archived from the original on 28 September 2013. Retrieved 13 September 2010.
- ^'Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban'. Metacritic. Archived from the original on 13 November 2007. Retrieved 21 September 2007.
- ^'CinemaScore'. cinemascore.com. Archived from the original on 6 February 2018. Retrieved 14 November 2018.
- ^LaSalle, Mick (4 June 2004). 'It had to happen. Harry Potter's growing up'. San Francisco Chronicle. Archived from the original on 22 June 2004. Retrieved 21 January 2011.
- ^'Harry Potter: Prisoner of Azkaban'. The Hollywood Reporter. 28 May 2004. Archived from the original on 17 April 2007. Retrieved 21 September 2007.
- ^'Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban'. Newsround. 27 May 2004. Archived from the original on 12 October 2007. Retrieved 21 September 2007.
- ^Zacharek, Stephanie (3 June 2004). 'Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban'. Salon.com. Archived from the original on 2 August 2011. Retrieved 17 November 2010.
- ^Arthur, Nicole (4 June 2004). 'Cuaron's Magic Touch'. The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 11 November 2012. Retrieved 22 January 2011.
- ^Ebert, Roger (3 June 2004). 'Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban'. Chicago Sun Times. Archived from the original on 12 October 2007. Retrieved 23 September 2007.
- ^Puig, Claudia (3 June 2004). 'Azkaban wizard Cuaron casts an artful spell'. USA Today. Archived from the original on 7 May 2008. Retrieved 23 September 2007.
- ^Roeper, Richard (3 June 2004). 'Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban'. Ebert & Roeper. Archived from the original on 7 March 2008. Retrieved 23 September 2007.
- ^Smith, Sean (31 May 2004). 'The Harry Potter books have finally gotten the wondrous movie they deserve. The Prisoner of Azkaban boasts a brand-new director and a bold new vision'. Newsweek. Retrieved 23 September 2007.[dead link]
- ^Gleiberman, Owen (3 June 2004). 'Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban'. Entertainment Weekly. Archived from the original on 12 October 2007. Retrieved 24 September 2007.
- ^ ab'The 77th Academy Awards (2005) Nominees and Winners'. Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences. Archived from the original on 10 June 2014. Retrieved 16 October 2012.
- ^'Empire's Greatest Movies of all Time'. Empire. Archived from the original on 13 May 2011. Retrieved 13 December 2010.
- ^Pirrello, Phil (4 April 2011). 'IGN's Top 25 Fantasy Films'. IGN. Archived from the original on 7 April 2011. Retrieved 5 April 2011.
- ^'Prisoner of Azkaban named film of the decade'. BBC. 16 March 2011. Archived from the original on 18 March 2011. Retrieved 16 March 2011.
- ^'AFI's 100 Years..100 Movies (10th Anniversary Edition) Ballot'(PDF). Archived(PDF) from the original on 28 March 2014. Retrieved 30 June 2011.
- ^Institute, American Film. 'AFI.com Error'(PDF). afi.com. Archived(PDF) from the original on 23 August 2013. Retrieved 30 June 2011.
- ^'Amanda Awards for 2005'. Internet Movie Database. Archived from the original on 9 July 2011. Retrieved 16 October 2012.
- ^'Bafta Film Awards 2005: The nominations'. BBC News. 17 January 2005. Archived from the original on 14 December 2013. Retrieved 16 October 2012.
- ^'Broadcast Film Critics Association Awards'. Internet Movie Database. Archived from the original on 27 November 2012. Retrieved 16 October 2012.
- ^'Nominee list for the 47th Annual Grammy Awards'. Sound Spike. 7 December 2004. Archived from the original on 3 May 2012. Retrieved 16 October 2012.
- ^'2005 Hugo Award Nominations'. AwardWeb. Archived from the original on 9 May 2012. Retrieved 16 October 2012.
- ^'2005 Host/Nominee Release – Knickelodeon Kids Choice Awards'. Nickelodeon. 8 February 2005. Archived from the original on 5 September 2014. Retrieved 16 October 2012.
- ^'MTV Movie Awards for 2002'. Internet Movie Database. Archived from the original on 23 March 2011. Retrieved 3 February 2011.
- ^'2004 PHOENIX FILM CRITICS SOCIETY AWARD WINNERS'. Internet Movie Database. Archived from the original on 8 July 2011. Retrieved 16 October 2012.
- ^'Saturn Awards Nominations'. Saturn Awards. Archived from the original on 29 October 2005. Retrieved 2 January 2018.
- ^'Teen Choice Awards for 2005'. Internet Movie Database. Archived from the original on 2 July 2012. Retrieved 16 October 2012.
- ^'3rd Annual VES Awards'. Visual Effects Society. Archived from the original on 8 March 2016. Retrieved 2 January 2018.
External links[edit]
| Wikiquote has quotations related to: Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban (film) |
- Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban on IMDb
- Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban at AllMovie
- Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban at Rotten Tomatoes
- Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban at Box Office Mojo
- Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban at Metacritic
ISOs » Sony Playstation 2 » H » Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban (USA)
Sony Playstation 2 / PS2 ISOs
Genre: Action-Adventure
Rating: ESRB: E10+, ESRB: E
How to Play this Game ?
Quick Navigation:
Game Description & Reviews:
Anonymous says:
If you love the Harry Potter series and you can get past a few rough edges, Prisoner of Azkaban should be a satisfyingly interactive way to experience the story once again.
Based on the upcoming movie of the same name that will be in theaters on June 4, Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban is an action adventure in the style of The Legend of Zelda that's targeted primarily at kids, but it is also reasonably entertaining for adult fans of the Potter series. The gameplay and storytelling are solid, if a bit simplistic, but a great number of rough edges mar what could have otherwise been a much more polished game.
Help Harry Potter avoid escaped prisoner Sirius Black in Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban.
It's a safe bet that much of this game's potential audience is already familiar with the storyline from the original novel, or they soon will be when the movie version is released. If you're not, Prisoner of Azkaban recounts Harry Potter's third year at Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry, a year that is dogged by the feared criminal Sirius Black. Black, the eponymous escaped prisoner, was somehow involved in the death of Harry's parents and he is making great efforts to reach--and presumably kill--young Potter as well. As with all the stories in the Harry Potter series, this one has more twists and surprises than you can shake a stick at, so if you don't already know what's going to happen, you'll be in for some surprises. The game mostly does a decent job of following the original storyline, though some liberties are taken to create new playable sequences. Meanwhile, some events from the book are only touched upon in passing, giving the story presentation a sometimes disjointed and hurried feeling. The game's story works pretty well, but it's better experienced as a companion to the book or movie, rather than as a standalone narrative.
The gameplay in Prisoner of Azkaban has been expanded upon from previous Harry Potter games, primarily because you can now play as not only Harry but also his best friends, Ron and Hermione. You'll progress through the storyline by pursuing basic quest goals that will have you attending particular classes, searching for key items, and helping out those in need. Once all your goals are completed for a given section, you'll have the option of ending the day and moving on to the next chapter or simply roaming around Hogwarts and exploring. The game's basic control scheme lets you map two spells to your action buttons, and a lock-on ability lets you dodge and keep your aim focused on a particular enemy or item of interest. You can switch between the three characters at the touch of a button, although sometimes you'll be limited to just one or two of them as situations dictate.
Harry, Ron, and Hermione each have different abilities that will come in handy as you fight magical enemies and solve puzzles.
Although the basic controls are the same for all three characters, the game does a pretty good job of differentiating between Harry, Ron, and Hermione. Harry is the only one that can do athletic things like leap across chasms or climb up ropes; Ron has the ability to spot secret doorways and other hidden things; and Hermione can squeeze through small spaces that the boys can't. The puzzles in the game are pretty easy, but they make good use of the three friends' unique abilities, and you'll have to switch between characters to accomplish different parts of the same task. The characters all have access to some basic spells, such as the attack spell Flipendo, while other spells are character-specific: Ron can use the Lumos spell, that fans will know from the books, to shine a light on some enemies and items while Hermione's Glacius spell can freeze hotheaded enemies and cool down some puzzle elements. Overall, the spellcasting is functional but not very flashy, and it provides another reason to switch between the three characters to defeat foes and solve puzzles.
There's nothing wrong with Prisoner of Azkaban from a design standpoint--it's a good, if easy, action adventure. The execution leaves a bit to be desired, though, since there are a host of small issues that combine to make the game a little less enjoyable than it could have been. The load times are on the long side, which is unfortunate because you'll run into them a tad too frequently while you're roaming around the school. The visual presentation is a bit rough at times--some enemies perish by simply blinking out of existence, for instance. The artificial intelligence that controls your friends can be a little dumb; sometimes the other characters will fail to follow you around or will shoot you with their spells if you're in the way. Finally, we ran into some fairly minor issues with collision and cutscenes that weren't game-breaking, but they were still disappointing to see in what's otherwise a pretty good game. It seems like the game would have benefited from some more time in development to polish up these slight issues.
Prisoner of Azkaban does a good job of re-creating the school of Hogwarts and its occupants in 3D. You'll travel to various classrooms, the dungeon, and even outside the castle itself, and all of the environments are serviceably crafted with lots of magical set pieces and other characters who are roaming around. A few more small touches would have further brought the backgrounds to life, though; fans of the series may wish that all of the paintings in the castle actually moved, instead of just a few of them. The characters in the game look like cartoon versions of their movie counterparts, so they're not totally identical but still similar enough that everyone will recognize Snape's sneer or the kind, wizened brow of Dumbledore. There's even a nice cloth physics system used to make the three playable characters' robes billow out as they run around. As usual, the Xbox version of the game looks noticeably better than the PS2 game--with better lighting and textures overall--though both games look similar in terms of basic polygonal detail. As a whole, the audio in the game is adequate but not particularly rousing, with appropriate whiz- and zing-style sound effects accompanying your spellcasting, and a nice orchestral score backing up the action. The voice acting is also appropriate to the setting--everybody sounds British--and the voices generally match the personality of their film counterparts (though a few are slightly different).
Hogwarts looks pretty nice, for the most part, in this latest installment of the series.
There isn't a whole lot of material outside of the main story mode in Prisoner of Azkaban. Three minigames that appear throughout the game are also available for play from the main menu--these let you have wizarding duels with other students, race owls, and fly around on a hippogriff. Furthermore, the PlayStation 2 version features a full suite of EyeToy minigames that are surprisingly entertaining. Some of these are similar to the games that appeared on last year's EyeToy: Groove in that your primary occupation is waving your arms around like a lunatic as you try to swat at (and sometimes clap at) moving objects. Other games here are more interesting, though. One game has you match up exploding snap cards while another makes you chase down the golden snitch in the fictional wizards' sport of quidditch as you try to avoid a marauding bludger. If you're into the EyeToy thing, these bonus games actually add some nice extra value to the PS2 version; they are certainly worth checking out. Something similar would have been nice on the Xbox to flesh out the package, since there's no real incentive to play through the story again, but alas, you only get the three minigames there.
Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban is a by-the-numbers movie-licensed game that makes pretty good use of its source material without really doing anything too surprising. It's perfect for kids, since the puzzles and combat are both easy enough that youngsters won't have a hard time getting through them. Older gamers won't find it very challenging at all, but that doesn't mean it won't be entertaining while it lasts. If you love the Harry Potter series and think it would be fun in video game form (and you can get past a few rough edges), Prisoner of Azkaban should serve as a nice, interactive way to experience the story once again.
Videos and Image Media:
Upload a Screenshot/Add a Video:
Now you can add videos, screenshots, or other images (cover scans, disc scans, etc.) for Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban (USA) to Emuparadise. Do it now!
| Support Emuparadise: | Sponsor Message: |
Share with your Friends:Support Emuparadise:Find out how else you can support emuparadise.It's free, easy and feels damn good! For starters, share this page with your friends. Use the links above : ) |
- SEGA SuperStars »
- Back to Stone »
- Bully »
Emulators:
Recommended Emulators
Linux
PCSX2
Mac OS X
PCSX2
PCSX2-CE
Windows
PCSX2
For more emulators, check out our extensive emulators section.
Prisoner Of Azkaban Cast
Harry Potter Lego Prisoner Of Azkaban Walkthrough
Talk about Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban (USA):
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.